Showing posts with label Films. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Films. Show all posts

Sunday, 13 March 2016

Strong Women and their Role in Film

Hello children. Welcome back. It shouldn't really be a surprise to you that I'm going completely off topic with this post. Daniel has been ill this weekend, so I've had to entertain myself. With this unexpected free time, I watched a lot of films. So I'm pondering the role of women in children's films.

Growing up, as everyone knows, I absolutely loved Disney (of course I still do!) But I always hear the criticism that "there are very few strong women in Disney films", and I have to say that, within the films I grew up with, I agree. You don't have to look very far to see evidence of weak women, who just want to please their fathers/husbands/boyfriends/anyone else who comes along. There's Snow White, who doesn't really even do anything, Sleeping Beauty (it's in the name, she literally falls asleep), Maid Marian in Robin Hood, Wendy and Tiger Lilly in Peter Pan. Even the Swan Princess. I know that isn't a Disney film, but it was one I watched quite a lot at one point. But she really didn't do a lot, except turn into a swan. She's the eponymous character and I can't even for the life of me remember her name, although I think it ends in "-ette". How's that for weak?

And you see what I mean. There are no strong women in that list; just some awkward racial stereotypes and some princesses who couldn't look after themselves. Snow White is the perfect example of this. She is the loving daughter, who does everything she's told. She can't defend herself from anything, including a tree the catches on her dress. She's so pretty that even a hired hitman can't bring himself to kill her. She looks after seven, incompetent men (that's another stereotype we'll talk about another time) by cooking and cleaning for them. It just puts forward this horrendous image of the good little girl who couldn't do anything for herself, except the housework.
And I know part of that is because it's a fairy tale which is (at least) as old as my dad, back from a time when young ladies did as they were told. And the other part is because it's a film from the thirties when women were still massively restricted in what they could do. 

But nowadays, these women (Snow White and the type) have such an enormous impact on young girls. I heard it described once as "Disney films do to women what pornography does to men." Whilst crude, this makes a fair point, I guess. Both provide unrealistic ideas on behaviour and relationships in all forms and for both parties. If you compare it in that way, the affect that Disney has on little children is somewhat scary.

But the thing is, strong women do exist in Disney. It's just that I was never introduced to them. Looking back at it this weekend, I realised that all the films I never saw as a child are the ones where the women do the most. Mulan, who literally goes away to fight for her country. Pocahontas, who tries to protect her family and her tribe from a force she doesn't fully understand. Megara (from Hercules) who, although she once sold her soul to Hades to be with a man, has learnt from her mistakes and now stands on her own feet. Esmerelda (Hunchback of Notre Dame), who fights for what she believes in, even if it means she is persecuted.* Then there's all the modern films which I just couldn't watch as a child because they didn't exist: Merida in Brave manages not to fall in love for an entire film, Anna and Elsa fight for each other and themselves in Frozen, even if they don't quite do what you'd expect, or even suggest, and Tiana in The Princess and the Frog (although she actually is a frog) also manages to work hard and do everything for herself - or at least try! You could even argue that Rapunzel is arguably up there too, as she stands up to Flynn/Eugene (having never even met anyone who wasn't her "mother" before) and later standing up to Goethel herself.

And even in the films I watched, the powerful women were never the protagonists. For example, look at Lilo and Stitch. Nani, Lilo's sister, is one of the most strong women in any Disney film in my humble opinion. Her parents have died, leaving her with a younger sister to look after while she herself is trying to succeed in life. She must only be a teenager. She works as much as she can, and still manages to be the best guardian Lilo could ask for. She even lets her feed the goldfish peanut butter!

And this is exactly what we need more of in Disney. There are so many films that have these strong characters in them that girls can look up to, they're just hidden behind a layer of flounce and looking gorgeous. Or they're pushed off to one side to make room for a cute yet gross alien. So I guess what I'm trying to say is, if you have a child, you should try to expose them to women in as many different roles in film as possible. Show them powerful women, and weak women, women who can lead, and women who follow. Both boys and girls should learn that anyone can be anything - it doesn't matter whether you're male, female, or neither. You can be strong if you want to.



*I am fully aware that there are cultural misappropriation issues with some Disney films, including Mulan, Pocahontas and Lilo and Stitch. There is absolutely no way that I'm say that this is excusable or acceptable, but that is a matter for an entirely different post. The women in those films are still powerful and clever.

Tuesday, 5 June 2012

Computer Games

Hello All (I got told off for writing "sexy beasts" last time). How are we today? Sorry I haven't updated in a while, real life took control :(
I have been pondering computer games today for a reason which will become apparent; this evening, James (my brother) and I are at a friend's house because my parents are "sociable" and the boys I am with are intent on playing computer games all night. Which is fascinating. Except that one of them thinks anything we do is boring (but can't come up with anything better to do - genius that).

Computer games were, it appears, invented by nerds for nerds without girlfriends or the entrepreneurial skills to invent their own computer games. Or those who are bored inventing computer games and just want a break. The are the most colossal waste of time and don't do anything for any form of personal skills. Just ask my brother.

This can also be said for most of the videos on YouTube (you tube). Who cares whether or not a cat can say "no no no no no no" for a minute and a half, or whether a baby looks scared at the camera? Apparently, Russell Howard and some more nerds, who got RSI from their computer games. Actually,  there are some pretty good videos out there, such as the "Urban Sports" series and the video I will be uploading later tonight, or tomorrow, of our neighbours singing "Sweet Caroline" very excitedly at yesterday's street party.
And little clips from film and TV can be funny too.

Comments?

Saturday, 5 May 2012

Odd Requests

Today I have been pondering odd requests, such as the one which was put to me on Thursday.

As a result of this, today several of my friends and I went to meet up with Ross and some of his friends (who we had never met) at the cinema in Enfield. This was both funny and awkward as Ross didn't bother to introduce us to his friends, so we named them Julio. All of them. Well, apart from one, who we named Juan. He was our favourite; there was also one (Julio) who looked like Michael Crout, which was really funny. So, after being asked to see a film  I wasn't particularly interested in seeing, but which was very good, with a bunch of people I didn't know, I didn't even get to know the people I didn't know. But Josh Roper came, and that was nice.

As part of today's outing, I have now purchased a bright turquoise wig and a pair of fetching rose-tinted spectacles. They are both amazing and look rather sexy whether worn together or separately. It really is better looking at the world through rose-tinted spectacles; everything looks very grey when you remove them. I'm currently considering whether or not I could get away with wearing them for exams, as a medical purpose (preventing depression or sleep). I'm also wondering whether the head would allow the wearing of a turquoise wig as part of the uniform; it doesn't say we can't wear wigs.

So yeah, that's all really, I like fun fun fun things.

By the way, I have Twitter. If you want to follow me, or tell me or anything, or just laugh at the two happy whales I have as my picture, then please do. It's probably #EmPernilla I'm not quite sure how this dooby works. I also don't use Twitter much, ever, so I don't even know why I am suggesting this, but it seems like the cool thing to do these days.

Monday, 2 April 2012

Movie Adaptations

Once I again, I have found something to ponder and bore you with my opinion of. Today, after several hours of hard revision, I rewarded myself by watching "Starter for Ten" — a film based on the book by David Nicholls. It's very good. Possibly better than the book, which was annoying.

For those of you who don't know, "Starter for Ten" is about a boy called Brian who's struggling through his first year at a University (which we're assured isn't Oxford or Cambridge). His life's dream is to appear on University Challenge, hence the name of the book / film. It's an interesting story and the characters are so believable you actually don't like them at times. The book was interesting and included such gems as "Enough of this Shelley, I'm off to tarmac something" and "The ironic thing is, I actually AM a vicar", which continue to make me smile. And the film... Well, like I said, in some ways the film was better than the book, but in some ways it was worse, as is always the case with films. Which made me wonder whether we could ever really have a perfect adaptation of a book to film. I understand that they are clearly two different genres of expression (or whatever), but surely there has to be some overlap?

The film, as a piece of cinematography, is very good; there are some good actors and actresses in it, including Catherine Tate, Benedict Cumberbatch, James Corden, that guy from "Mamma Mia!" and (for about five seconds, being shouty at the end) David Tennant, and the camera work and special effects (of which there admittedly weren't many) were clever and believable. And compared to the novel, the script was pretty accurate. Well, accurate apart from the fact that one of the main characters was meant to be Glaswegian and appeared to be from Bedfordshire, and that chunks of the story line were left out of the film which (while most of them weren't integral) were really funny (like the Shelley quote). So maybe this is as good as it gets? A good film which portrays the story in an accurate way (without making you hate the central character) which stars good actor? There should be more to life, surely?

Any better book/film combos? Let me know.